"Unfortunately, the individuals hurt most by Jolie's transparently tactical gambit are the parties' own children, who continue to be deprived of a final resolution to these custody issues", the documents read.
The documents say Jolie's request is 'a thinly veiled attempt. Together, the exes share six children: 19-year-old Maddox, 16-year-old Pax, 15-year-old Zahara, 14-year-old Shiloh, and 12-year-old twins Knox and Vivienne.
Brad's submitting is in response to Angelina's August 7 request to have Ouderkirk - the personal choose overseeing their divorce case - faraway from the authorized proceedings. HollywoodLife obtained Angelina's court docket paperwork, wherein she alleges Decide Ouderkirk had a earlier relationship with Brad's lawyer, Anne C. Kiley.
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie attend a private reception as costumes and props from Disney's "Maleficent" are exhibited in support of Great Ormond Street Hospital at Kensington Palace on May 8, 2014 in London. The papers state that Jolie's motion for replacement of Judge Ouderkirk should be denied. The actor's legal team claims Judge Ouderkirk "has had a well-documented history" with the former couple, noting that Angelina "hand-selected" the judge to preside over her August 2014 wedding to Brad. She had 'never objected to Ouderkirk 'continued involvement in the proceedings until now.
However, Pitt opposed Jolie's claimed and slammed his ex-wife with a counter appeal, calling her filing a "Hail Mary" - a term in football that means unsuccessful pass made in a desperate attempt to score late in the game.Читайте также: New Zealand loses coronavirus-free status after more than 100 days
As per Page Six, Jolie already filed a request in Los Angeles Superior Court. They also pointed out that Angelina has stipulated three times to extend Judge Ouderkirk's appointment. Instead, it was a little secret between Judge Ouderkirk and [Pitt's] counsel.
The actor furthermore said, "These are precisely the type of repeat customer circumstances that create doubts about a privately-compensated private judge's ability to remain impartial". "The one manner litigants can belief the method is for everybody concerned to make sure that there's transparency and impartiality", DeJean concluded.
In response, Angelina Jolie's camp refuted this accusation.
Almost 4 years after their divorce case was submitted in 2016, the Maleficent 2 star has actually apparently asked to get rid of the personal judge supervising her drawn-out divorce and child custody fight with the star. Why?
Angelina, 45, was awarded temporary full custody while Brad, 56, was investigated by child services and was allowed supervised visits only. While their court dealings were turbulent at first, as seen in public divorce/custody documents, the pair later filed to have them sealed to ensure privacy.При любом использовании материалов сайта и дочерних проектов, гиперссылка на обязательна.
«» 2007 - 2021 Copyright.
Автоматизированное извлечение информации сайта запрещено.
Код для вставки в блог